The Consequences of Arbitrary and Selective Enforcement
of Prostitution Laws
Norma Jean Almodovar
Sex Worker Rights Activist,
Founder and President- ISWFACE
(International Sex Worker Foundation for Art, Culture and Education)
Executive Director, COYOTE Southern California
author “Cop to Call Girl” (Simon and Schuster, 1994)
“Police, Prostitution and Politics- Commercial $ex $candals in America” (unpublished)
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 2
This paper examines the serious and hopefully unintended consequences of arbitrary and selective
enforcement of laws prohibiting prostitution, where police agents are given opportunities to be
intimate with suspected prostitutes and are allowed to pick and choose which ‘victims’ they will
In policing criminal activity, law enforcement agents generally do not have to decide which
bank robber, rapist, car thief, kidnapper, pedophile or murderer to search for and apprehend. A
victim or a victim’s family files a report and the police launch an investigation. While they may
not catch every suspect, the case remains open until it is solved. The goal of the justice system is
to arrest, prosecute and punish every individual who commits such crimes.
Such is not the case when policing victimless crime- that is ‘crimes’ which are perpetrated
by the ‘victim.’ Because the ‘victims’ (or prostitutes) are not likely to contact law enforcement
and file a complaint against themselves, the police become the complainant. Because there are so
many ‘victims’ and their clients who are also ‘criminals,’ there are simply not enough financial
resources available to any law enforcement agency anywhere to apprehend every suspected
prostitute and every client. Therefore the laws must be arbitrarily enforced. This paper examines
what happens when laws can be enforced selectively; the damage done to society as a whole, in
the corruption of the judicial system, as well as the damage to the prostitutes/victims and even to
the law enforcement officers who arrest them.
Keywords: prostitution, police corruption, arbitrary law enforcement
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 3
The Consequences of Arbitrary and Selective Enforcement of Prostitution Laws
As long as prostitution has existed, there have been government and religious crusades to
eliminate it, and when those crusades were not successful, the focus turned to controlling those
who practiced it. Throughout the history of the attempted abolition of prostitution, many reasons
have been given for the need to do so, ranging from lofty moral arguments that sex outside of
marriage is a sin to the more recent pedantic declarations that all prostitution demeans or degrades
all women. In the late 20th century, a hybrid claim that gave a nod to both the moral and
sententious arguments came into vogue again, attempting to convince politicians and the public
that prostitution was not only an evil enterprise, but the prostitutes themselves were actually
victims of modern day slavery.
Anti-porn/prostitution feminists and their religious conservative accomplices allege that all
prostitutes are coerced one way or another into prostitution and are emotionally if not physically
harmed by their pimps and/or clients. Accordingly, the only way to eliminate the harm is to
rescue the prostitute through the continued prohibition against commercial sex and even more
stringent penalties for those who break the law. The anti- prostitution folks claim they want to
punish the clients but remove the criminality of being a prostitute. Meanwhile, it is the prostitute
who is ‘rescued/arrested’ by the cops and the occasional client snagged in periodic sting
operations. For example, on April 3, 2010, Modesto, CA cops1 had nothing to do so they decided
to bust the prostitutes who worked out of the California Inn. But rather than take the time to make
a proper arrest, the cops used a law that allows them to arrest prostitutes on the suspicion of
intending to commit prostitution. They arrested 7 women, but the men were not cited or arrested
and were encouraged to "go home and not come back."
As I will show, being rescued is far more detrimental to prostitutes than any imagined
affliction that results from taking money for an act of sex. There are abundant counter arguments
to the prevailing specious exploitation hypotheses, but in this context, it is irrelevant whether all
prostitutes are victims or whether prostitution is degrading, nor does it matter where or how the
prostitute works or how much the prostitute earns or whether they consent to engage in
commercial sex. What matters is the serious harm to prostitutes, cops and society that is a direct
consequence of the arbitrariness inherent in the laws and the human nature of those who enforce
them. While agents of the government are expected to apply the laws in a constitutional, equitable
manner; laws which can be selectively enforced tempt even the most trustworthy officers to fudge
reports and make dubious arrests.
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 4
I witnessed this first hand. I should mention that in 1972 at the age of 21, I was employed by
the Los Angeles Police Department as a civilian traffic officer in the years before women were hired
as sworn police officers. I was primarily assigned to the night watch, driving a patrol car without a gun
and usually without a partner. I spent the next decade watching with dismay the way my sworn
colleagues went about selectively enforcing many laws, but in particular, those related to prostitution
and pornography. Pornography was legalized by a court decision in the early 1980s which left
prostitutes out in the cold. I knew from the time that two of my LAPD colleagues offered me $200 to
be the going away present for a retiring captain there something was very wrong with laws which
could be so arbitrarily enforced. After ten years of looking the other way, I could no longer justify
remaining silent, and after a series of on-duty traffic accidents, I decided that I would rather be an
honest whore than to continue working for the LAPD. My outspoken criticism of police corruption led
to a sting operation, the confiscation of my unfinished manuscript, and I ended up a convicted felon
serving time at the California Institute for Women. My case is chronicled in my autobiography, “Cop
to Call Girl” (1993, Simon and Schuster) and in television interviews such as “60 Minutes” and
“American Justice.” I have been a sex worker rights activist since I left the LAPD in 1982 and, due to
my notoriety, after prison I had to forgo earning a living as a prostitute in order to focus on my
activism in the sex worker rights movement.
The purpose of police agencies is to protect the life and property of the citizens of the
communities they serve from those who use force, the threat of force, fraud or coercion against
others. Laws which prohibit one individual or group of individuals from violating the rights of
others are justifiable and proper. Victims of a crime, known as ‘complainants,’call the police and
file a report. An investigation is launched and if the investigation shows that a crime was indeed
committed and a perpetrator is found, the police make an arrest and then it is up to the prosecutor
to persuade a judge and/or jury of the suspect’s guilt. If convicted, the perpetrator is punished in
whatever manner is prescribed for the offense.
If this had been the extent of law enforcement’s role in the community when I joined the
LAPD, there is no question that the pervasive corruption would not prevail as it does in nearly
every city in the country. Of course there would still be some corruption, as it is a sad fact of life
that humans can be and are corrupted by money, position and power. The temptations for law
enforcement agents exist for any number of illegal human activities, from robbery to murder.2
John Marzulli of the NY Daily News (3/16/2010) reports, “2 Cops Who Killed for Mafia: Feds
Say Retired Detective Pals are Linked to at Least 8 Murders.” And the NY Daily News also
reported (3/5/10) “2 NYPD Police Officers Charged In $1M NJ Perfume Heist.” Fortunately, the
number of officers who do not succumb to those temptations far exceeds the number who do.
Unfortunately, there are a growing number of officers who succumb to other temptations when
making arrests for ‘victimless crimes.’
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 5
The majority of police are less likely to overlook serious criminal activity when it involves
child abuse, rape, robbery, assault, murder or anything for which there is a real victim, except
when cops commit those crimes. In 2006, NYPD Officer Angel Negron3 was arrested and
charged with molesting a young girl for 4 years... starting from the time she was 8 years old. And
LAPD officer Michael Casados got caught- not once but twice- for having sex with underage
female explorer scouts, including one who was 10 years old when he started having sex with her.
He was fired but did not go to prison for his activities, and neither did any of the other officers
who were involved in the Explorer Scout sex scandals in Hollywood in the 1980s.
When serious crimes do occur, police resources are rightfully spent to locate and apprehend
the perpetrator, regardless of how long it takes. The police may not always be successful and
sometimes the statute of limitations runs out on ‘lesser’ crimes, but as a rule the police do not pick
and choose which cases they will pursue. Serious criminals are not given a free pass nor are they
offered more opportunities to commit crimes by agreeing to cooperate with the police and give
the police information on other ‘criminals,’ as they often are if they are prostitutes or madams.4
Infamous Hollywood Madam Heidi Fleiss’ predecessor Elizabeth Adams, aka Madam
Alex, is a prime example of cooperation. She operated one of the most successful prostitution
rings in Los Angeles history for over 25 years, with the full knowledge and consent of the LAPD.
She was considered an asset to law enforcement because of the types of information she was able
to provide them, which ‘lead to major, major criminals going to jail,’ according to defense
witness LAPD Detective Daniel Lott, during Madam Alex’s 1988 criminal hearing after she had
been arrested for failing to give information to another vice cop, LAPD Detective Alan
Vanderpool. In the arrest report, Vanderpool stated, “No contact. Inactive. Should go to jail.” As
long as she provided him with information, she was free to ‘exploit’ the women who worked for
her and make as much money as she could. During her criminal hearing, in May of 1990,5 the LA
Times reported ‘Court Told of Help Madam Gave Police,’ “Beverly Hills Madam’ Elizabeth
Adams was lauded for her undercover police work by a member of the same agency that arrested
her on suspicion of pandering in 1988. “She was the best informant I ever met,” veteran LAPD
Detective Daniel Lott testified at a hearing on a defense motion to dismiss charges against her.
Lott, who acknowledged an ongoing professional relationship with Adams during most of his 27
years on the force as a vice and narcotics detective said that...“the department looked the other
way at her brothel activities because of the help she provided on numerous criminal cases.”’
Ironically, if, rather than threaten to expose her list of clients, Heidi Fleiss had agreed to
become an informant like Madam Alex from whom she stole the “little black book” Alex kept in a
Kleenex box on her bed, Heidi might still be operating her call girl ring.
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 6
In September of 1990, San Diego’s cozy relationship between prostitutes and cops was exposed
by the San Diego Union; ‘Alleged Links Between Cops, Prostitutes Raise many Deeply Troubling
Questions.’ Joe Cantlupe wrote, “Police Chief Bob Burgreen said ‘dealing with prostitutesespecially
on an informant basis- is a very large part of our business’ and that perhaps citizens in
a largely conservative community like San Diego may have a hard time understanding that.’”
Unfortunately for the victims of real crimes, the police and the community- a small
segment of society has saddled the police with a mandate to enforce a myriad of prohibitionist
regulations which turn the police from impartial protector and ally of true victims to the arbiter of
moral values. According to politicians who support these regulations, the laws are ‘for our own
Where the ‘victim’ is also the ‘criminal,’ the police officer becomes the ‘complainant’ who
must instigate a violation of law to make an arrest. The cops are permitted to go as far as
necessary to ensure a conviction, including having sex6 with a suspected prostitute/victim, or
hiring7 someone from the community to have sex with the suspected prostitute and then testifying
against that victim/criminal. In 1979, Spokane, WA, Judge Daniel Maggs said ‘Police agents
may engage in sex to carry out prostitution investigations as long as they don’t try to trap anyone
into the crime, a Spokane County District Court Judge has ruled. Judge Daniel Maggs said “It
may violate public morals but personal beliefs can’t be substituted for the law.”’
More recently, Tom Jackman of the Washington Post reported (2/13/06) ‘Spotsylvania(VA)
Deputies Receive Sex Services in Prostitution Cases,’
“They enter the massage parlors as undercover detectives. They leave as satisfied
customers. In Spotsylvania County, as part of a campaign by the sheriff's office to root
out prostitution in the massage parlor business, detectives have been receiving sexual
services from "masseuses." During several visits to Moon Spa on Plank Road last
month, detectives allowed women to perform sexual acts on them on four occasions and
once left a $350 tip, according to court papers...”
Although many police agencies claim they no longer allow this practice, the reality is that
the cops often go beyond what is necessary to “catch suspects in the act.” As Spotsylvania, VA
County Sheriff Howard Smith said, he stands by the practice of allowing detectives to receive
sexual services in the course of their investigations, “because fondling alone is not a crime in
Virginia and that the massage-parlor employees spoke little English. For those reasons,
Spotsylvania authorities said the detectives were advised to allow the acts of prostitution to
proceed further than in a simple street prostitution arrest, in order to build a case that the owner
of the business knew of and profited from illegal sexual acts for money by employees...we are left
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 7
with the fundamental moral question of all criminal justice enforcement -- what is worse for our
community: Organized prostitution and all of the crime which is proven to arise from it -- or a
few police officers engaging in illicit sex acts in order to ultimately drive such crime from their
jurisdiction & to better protect their community?” Thoughtfully though, “only unmarried
detectives are assigned to such cases...” Smith continued, "It's not something the sheriff likes his
people to do, but in these cases, it's the only way to prosecute these people [for being victims of
exploitation...]." He said that the practice is not new and his department's approach was not a
secret since detectives had testified to similar experiences in trials of other massage parlor
Where cops are not allowed to engage in sex with alleged prostitutes to make their case, it
is nice to know that there are civic minded men in the community who will step up to bat for
them. From the Associated Press out of Nashville, Tennessee (02/02/05) comes this interesting
story: ‘Tenn. Prosecutor Probes Police Tactics,’ “Police have paid confidential informants
thousands of dollars to engage in sexual encounters with prostitutes as part of a crackdown on
the sex business in Nashville, drawing criticism from the top prosecutor. Police spent almost
$120,000 over three years to foster the encounters, which involve sexual touching and sometimes
more. The evidence has helped the city close more than 35 businesses believed to be selling sex
and disconnect phone lines to about 100 escort services. ‘What's the greater good?’ asked Capt.
Todd Henry, who heads the department's specialized investigations division. ‘It may be distasteful
to some people, but it's better that we have those places shut down.’ Police pay informants about
$300 for up to three prostitution ‘buys,’ and an extra $100 for each additional transaction,
department officials said.”
As recently as November 2009, the cops have paid informants to have sex with prostitutes
in Pennsylvania, even though this particular case got thrown out by the appellate court:
‘Prostitution Case Tossed Over Gov't- Funded Sex,’ “An appeals court has ruled Pennsylvania
State Police botched a prostitution investigation in which troopers gave an informant money to
pay for sex four times at a massage parlor, along with a total of $180 for the man's trouble.”
There are numerous laws prohibiting all kinds of ‘immoral’ behavior, including laws
prohibiting the use of drugs and gambling, which also result in selective enforcement and its
accompanying corruption. However the consequences of the prohibition of consenting adult
prostitution are the most harmful to those whom the laws were intended to protect because they
are the most vulnerable.
Using drugs can alter one’s behavior, ‘selling’ intimate access to ones body does not. The
‘crime’ of prostitution is committed when one asks for, is offered or receives compensation8 for
performing sexual services which could otherwise be legally given away to as many sexual
partners as one wishes. The same sexual activities can be legally9 compensated when performed
in front of a camera and crew. California penal code states that to "Commit prostitution" means to
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 8
engage in sexual conduct for money or other consideration, but does not include sexual conduct
engaged in as a part of any stage performance, play, or other entertainment open to the public.
When identical sexual activity can be legal under some commercial circumstances,
including porn and adult stage shows, and also when there is no compensation, the consequences
to those who ‘illegally’ engage can be disastrous. Once again, it is the ambiguity of the laws that
is the direct cause of selective and arbitrary enforcement. Such enforcement is where the
‘complainant’ police officer can offer the criminal/victim leniency and the opportunity to
continue violating the law in exchange for cooperation. The use of prostitutes and madams as
informants has been a major tool for law enforcement in the apprehension of supposedly more
‘serious’ criminals. How are the cops able determine which prostitute/victims to rescue/ arrest and
which prostitute/victims can be sacrificed for the greater good; that is, allowed to continue being
exploited by their clients or these madam informants for money? It comes down to who is
‘cooperative’ and who is not.
There are far more people engaged in prostitution, as providers and clients, than can ever
be apprehended and prosecuted by currently available law enforcement resources. For every
prostitute, there must be at least 10 clients if the prostitute is to have a business. If every tax dollar
was allocated to the enforcement of prostitution laws and every police officer in every city was
assigned to the vice detail full time, and the vice detail operated 24 hours per day each and every
day, and every courtroom expropriated for the sole purpose of prosecuting prostitution cases,
there would still not be sufficient resources to arrest, prosecute and incarcerate every prostitute
and every client. Given that there are crimes with real victims which need solving, the only
option for law enforcement is to selectively enforce the laws.
When it comes to determining which clients to arrest, there is no question that there is a
double standard for those who are wealthy and have power and influence, and those who are poor
and more likely to seek a street worker than hire upscale prostitutes at $5,000 an hour. Former NY
Governor and billionaire Eliot Spitzer not only hired prostitutes but took them across state lines, a
federal offense. He was not arrested for any crime while the madam who ran the high end escort
agency who provided Mr. Spitzer’s call girls, went to prison. The madam who provided
prostitutes to Louisiana’s Republican Senator David Vitter was convicted of federal offenses and
sentenced to prison while David Vitter is still a senator. Other men like 75 year old Charles
Fletcher of Cape Coral, Florida, are not so lucky. Mr. Fletcher was arrested and charged with
solicitation, and his name and photo appear on a website dedicated to exposing everyone
engaging in prostitution activity.
The police have no way of ‘eliminating’ much prostitution and certainly not all prostitution
as many radical leftist feminists and religious conservatives are demanding. The draconian
enforcement of laws and even more draconian punishment necessary to ‘eradicate’ even a small
portion of prostitution would nullify everyone’s civil liberties. There is no constitutionally
acceptable way to mandate the intrusion into the most private activities of everyone or impose the
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 9
kind of harsh laws and penalties that would have any significant impact on those who are willing
to break the law.
In California, the definition of prostitution is not ‘sex for money’ but rather it is defined as
‘a lewd act for money or other consideration.’ And ‘lewd act’ is defined as ‘the touching of
breasts, buttocks or genitals for the purpose of sexual gratification or arousal.’
To make an arrest, a police officer can assert that the suspect/victim ‘possesses the intent to
commit prostitution,’ and the suspect/victim may be in a vehicle, whether moving or not.10 The
law says that there has to be an ‘act of furtherance’ to make the arrest legitimate, but that ‘act’ can
be the possession of a condom. This tends to discourage prostitutes from carrying condoms, if
having one on their person means that they will be arrested and sent to jail. If our goal is to
minimize the spread of sexually transmitted diseases, penalizing those who carry them is not a
good idea.
Beyond the health issues raised by penalizing the possession of a condom, more serious
issues should be considered: why would legislators pass a law that implies cops have the ability to
read minds? At present this law only pertains to prostitution, but if it passes constitutional muster,
why not make this useful tool available to all law enforcement to combat murder, bank robberies,
drug deals, domestic violence, terrorism, and even child sexual abuse within the Catholic
Church11 and the Boy Scouts?12 Wouldn’t it enable the cops to quickly solve all crimes if, for
example, they only had to allege their arrestee intended to rob a bank, and if the ‘suspect’ was
outside a bank, it could be considered an ‘act of furtherance’?
This presents a major problem for the courts, though, as they cannot always rely on the
honesty of the police in writing the reports upon which the arrests were based. I fondly recall my
training days at the LAPD academy13 when I was taught ‘creative report writing’ in which the
‘facts’ may be embellished to give more substance to the allegations, making it much more likely
that the defendant would be convicted of whatever crime or infraction of which they were
Fortunately I am not the only one pointing out the problem with lying cops. A respected
federal judge, Jack Weinstein, slammed the New York Police Department14 ‘as plagued by
"widespread falsification by arresting officers." He said that while the vast majority of cops don't
engage in crooked practices, it was common enough to be an institutional problem.’
The Wall Street Journal’s Amir Efrati reports (1/29/09): ‘Legal System Struggles With
How to React When Police Officers Lie,’ ‘"It is an open secret long shared by prosecutors,
defense lawyers and judges that perjury is widespread among law enforcement officers, though
it's difficult to detect in specific cases,” said Alex Kozinski, a federal appeals-court judge, in the
1990s.’ And Alan M. Dershowitz, told the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee
(12/1/1998) “Police perjury in criminal cases - particularly in the context of searches and other
exclusionary rule issues - is so pervasive that the former police chief of San Jose and Kansas City
has estimated that ‘hundreds of thousands of law-enforcement officers commit felony perjury
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 10
every year testifying about drug arrests alone.”
There is actually a term for cops lying on the stand and in writing their reports-
‘Testilying’15 for giving false testimony on the witness stand and ‘Reportilying.’ According to the
1993 Mollen Commission Report, “The practice of police falsification in connection with such
arrests is so common in certain precincts that it has spawned its own word: ‘testilying.’ . . .
Officers also commit falsification to serve what they perceive to be ‘legitimate’ law enforcement
ends - and for ends that many honest and corrupt officers alike stubbornly defend as correct. In
their view, regardless of the legality of the arrest, the defendant is in fact guilty and ought to be
As Christopher Slobogin notes in his 1996 University of Colorado Law Review article,16
“Police perjury also occurs in connection with the fabrication of their reports. Although not
technically testimony, police know these reports may be dispositive in a case resolved through
plea bargaining, and can be compared to testimony in cases that aren't. As a result,
‘reportilying’ also appears to be pervasive in some jurisdictions. The Mollen Commission, for
instance, described how narcotics police ‘falsify arrest papers to make it appear as if an arrest
that actually occurred inside a building [in violation of departmental regulations] took place on
the street...’ That perjury persists despite these risks can be explained by one simple factor:
police think they can get away with it. Police are seldom made to pay for their lying. To some
extent, this immunity may be due to their own expertise at deceit. Many prosecutors and judges
believe perjury is systematic and often suspect it is occurring in individual cases. But they also
frequently claim that they are not sure enough to do anything about it; after all, the typical
situation pits a police officer, well trained on how to ‘constitutionalize’ a case, against a person
charged with a crime, who is decidedly less aware of the relevant law.”
And more recently, the Boston Globe’s Dick Lehr (7/31/09) reported ‘A new Bright Line
Rule against lying.’ Asks Lehr, “The question I have for Boston Police Commissioner Ed Davis is
this: Why does it take a federal judge to throw a judicial tantrum about a lying cop before the
Boston Police Department investigates one of its own? The judge, Mark Wolf, kicked off a legal
brouhaha this spring by ruling that an arresting officer in a Boston gun case had testified falsely.
Wolf is mulling sanctions against a federal prosecutor in the case who failed to turn over police
records to defense attorneys revealing the cop’s credibility gap...
Indeed, it turns out the commissioner has plenty to say about police lying and the damage it
does to policing, not just in Boston but everywhere. ‘Dishonesty is inconsistent with the duties of
a police officer,’‘ he says. ‘We are paid to be witnesses, and when we are untruthful the system
breaks down.’”
Given that prostitutes are less believed on the stand than narcotic suspects, it is likely that
‘reportilying’ occurs more frequently in prostitution arrests. As Pasadena (CA) Superior Court
Judge Alston17 said, “Who in the hell is going to believe a whore on the witness stand, anyway?”
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 11
I am sure that’s what Houston Police Officer Samuel Roccaforte, a 28 year veteran of the
force, was counting on when on October 6, 2009, he arrested 46-year-old Phyllis Stokely.
According to the police report he filed subsequent to her arrest, she agreed to sexual intercourse
for $200. Unfortunately for the officer, Ms. Stokely secretly taped the conversation and presented
the tapes to her attorney. According to the tape, the conversation went as follows18:
Roccaforte could be heard saying, "I will tell you what I want. I'll take an (expletive) or sex
with a condom. Can you do that for me?" Stokely replied, "Sir, like I said, I don't provide
that kind of service."
Roccaforte went on, "Well, you did. You know you did, I know you did. There's no audio,
there's no video. It's going to be my word against yours and who do you think they're going
to believe?"19
Had the tape not existed, no doubt Ms. Stokely would be doing a stint in the pokey after
being coerced into accepting a plea. It is interesting to note what Roccaforte's attorney, Chip
Lewis, had to say about the charges against his client: “I find it very hard to put this whore's
credibility ahead of a well-decorated, exemplary officer. I'm very comfortable calling her a
prostitute because we have the ad (on the internet).” There is no question in my mind that Officer
Roccaforte and his fellow vice cops frequently took liberties with the truth on the prostitution
arrest reports they wrote because ‘well decorated, exemplary officers’ know that the judge and
jury will always believe them over the ‘whores,’ who in these situations, are considered criminals,
not ‘exploited trafficking victims.’ Maybe I am too quick to judge Officer Roccaforte a liar- it
could be that this well-decorated, exemplary officer was just so desperate to protect poor Phyllis
from exploitation and abuse at the hands of her real clients that he was willing to risk his career
by committing perjury just to ensure her physical and mental well being by arresting her even if
she hadn’t actually broken the law. As a Philadelphia vice cop said after a sting operation took
down 5 or more suspected prostitutes operating out of Center City, “Jail just may be the safest
place these high end hookers have ever been...”20
Many cops insist that arresting women and locking them up is really for ‘their own good.’
Such was the contention of now retired Boston vice officers Bill Dwyer and his partner Mark
Molloy. In 1982, a young Boston prostitute named Robin Benedict was working in Boston’s
Combat Zone. Vice officers Dwyer and Molloy “became aware of her activity and were actively
trying to stop her from working by arresting her multiple times.”
However, they couldn’t get any of her ‘johns’ to testify against her so that they could ‘put
her out of business’ for her own safety. They even asked one of her primary clients, Professor
William Douglas, to testify against her so she could do some time in jail and be safe from
predatory clients like... Professor Douglas. Douglas, an overweight, married, father of three and
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 12
respected professor at Tufts University, had become enamored of his sex worker and began
blowing through his personal savings to pay for his dates with her. He fantasized that their
relationship was something more than it was, and when he learned it was not, on Friday, March 5,
1983 Professor Douglas, brutally murdered her. Vice Detective Dwyer opined to a reporter that if
he had only been able to put Robin in jail, she might still be alive... but is this an appropriate or
viable solution to protecting potential victims of violence?21 Would we consider applying this
‘solution’ to victims of domestic violence or rape? If it is good enough to keep prostitutes safe,
why not use it to protect wives and rape victims?
Although her body was never found, Professor Douglas admitted to bashing her head in
with a sledgehammer, “pounding her so hard that her skull crumpled and he could see deep
inside her head.” In 1984 he was convicted and sent to prison for 18 to 20 years. He was released
in 1993, after serving less than half his sentence.22 The first few years after her murder, Robin’s
mother, Shirley Benedict, faithfully placed her daughter's picture and a notice of her annual
memorial Mass in the local paper. Each year, someone tore that picture from the newspaper,
scrawled the word ‘whore’ across it and mailed it to the Benedicts' home. There are unfortunately
many people out there, including cops and judges, who believe that if a woman is a whore, she
deserves whatever she gets. Pasadena (CA) Superior Court Judge Gilbert C. Alston,23 a former
police officer, said “A woman who goes out on the street and makes a whore out of herself opens
herself up to anybody. She steps outside the protection of the law... ”
If the ‘safety’ of women in potentially dangerous jobs is really what concerns society, why
was no one worried about my safety when I worked nights during most of my ten year career with
the LAPD, driving a patrol car without a gun or a partner, handling radio calls until 3 or 4 in the
morning? Now that was dangerous work! But no one sought to have me arrested and taken to jail
where I would be safe.
What cops don’t tell you is that prostitutes often get raped while in custody by the the very
men who are supposed to protect them. Men such as Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Deputy
Kenneth Lawrence,24 who raped a woman prisoner shortly after she was sentenced for
prostitution. And like Corrections Officer Willis, who coerced me into giving him oral sex at the
halfway facility where I was housed during my incarceration in 1988. This officer extorted sexual
favors from many women who came through the facility, and eventually, after I mentioned this
incident on a national television show upon my release, the officer was transferred to work in a
men’s prison. As he did not get arrested or lose his job, one can conclude that being extorted for
free sexual favors is not as harmful to women as consenting to be paid for sexual services.
According to Melissa Farley, “the experience of prostitution is just like rape. Prostitutes
are raped, on the average, eight to ten times per year...”25 I have no idea where she came up
with those statistics, because as a prostitute, I was never raped- not once. While individuals who
propagate this misinformation have a right to their unqualified opinions, why don’t us prostitutes
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 13
have just as much right to say we are NOT victims- except for being victims of the laws which
make us criminals and of the stupidity, ignorance and arrogance of those who refuse to listen to
our voices, those who believe we are better off being arrested and branded as prostitutes for the
rest of our lives?
Furthermore, those who claim that prostitution is like rape clearly have never been raped.
Anyone who has been raped knows that consensual sex for money is nothing like rape.
Apparently though, when a prostitute is actually raped or extorted into having sex by a law
enforcement agent, it is not a big deal.
But the rapes and extortions don’t just happen when a prostitute is in jail. They happen
when cops and judges decide to be ‘generous’ to prostitutes and allow them to continue working,
sex for protection, in exchange for free services.26
David Kocieniewski of the NY Newsday reported in 1991 ‘Bronx Cop Charged in Rape,’
“A police officer arrested yesterday on charges of raping a Bronx prostitute is being investigated
in connection with the slaying of another prostitute last year... Sources familiar with the case said
Office Kevin Burke allegedly made comments while assaulting the victim yesterday that may tie
him to the strangulation of a prostitute in the Bronx last year. The slaying occurred near the
scene of yesterday’s alleged rape.” Tellingly, while the author of the article said it was an
‘alleged’ rape, he did not state that either of the victims were ‘alleged’ prostitutes, just that they
were prostitutes.
When Hollywood Madam Heidi Fleiss was prosecuted for pandering in 1994, a number of
editorials were written about the waste of taxpayer dollars on the prosecution of victimless
crimes. Heidi’s girls were from upscale backgrounds and none were forced into their life of
highly paid sex with celebrities and politicians. One of those editorials in the New York Times
was written by Anna Quindlen, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and best-selling novelist.
In response, Heidi’s prosecutor, Alan Carter, wrote a letter to the editor dated December 7,
1994, protesting the statement that Ms. Quindlen made that ‘prostitution was a victimless crime.’
He stated “I have prosecuted and reviewed cases in which prostitutes were beaten, kidnapped,
raped and murdered. As Ms. Quindlen correctly states, there are statutes specific to each of these
crimes. However, she fails to recognize that prostitutes are particularly vulnerable to such
offenses and that panderers gain from placing prostitutes in jeopardy...”
What he failed to note is that none of Heidi’s girls had ever been raped, kidnapped or
murdered, and neither had any of the women working for Madam Alex, police informant; or that
even as he was prosecuting Heidi for potential harm to her employees, a Long Beach Police
Officer, Bryon Ellsberry, was being tried for actually raping a prostitute and upon his conviction,
was given a probation sentence.27 Unfortunately, prostitutes being raped or extorted for sexual
favors by cops happens far too often,28 which is ironic, as one of the main arguments for keeping
prostitution illegal is because, according to Prosecutor Carter, prostitutes are vulnerable to rape
and murder.
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 14
In June of 1985 San Diego Tribune journalist Vicki Torres wrote, ‘Slain Woman Linked to
Police Sex Case.’ According to Ms. Torres, “A woman found 11 days ago beaten and strangled
near Sunrise Highway in Pine Valley has been identified as Donna Marie Gentile, a convicted
prostitute whose involvement with two San Diego police officers resulted in the demotion of one
and the firing of another...” Gentile was the second victim in the string of prostitute murders,
which ultimately numbered over 45. A street sex worker and police informant, Gentile was found
strangled to death, her mouth stuffed with gravel, a month after she testified against two police
Donna’s death and the murder of 45 other prostitutes from 1985 to 1992 became a rallying
point for a number of San Diego artists, who were horrified to learn that the police consider
homicides of prostitutes to be ‘NHIs’ - an unofficial police term meaning ‘No Humans
Involved.’29 To have those who are supposed to protect prostitutes categorize prostitute murders
as NHIs does not render LA Prosecutor Alan Carter’s concern for Heidi’s girls at all credible!
Unfortunately the use of the term ‘NHI’ is not limited to San Diego cops. It is used by cops
nationwide to denote the homicides of ‘disposable people.’
I’d say these are reasons to keep cops away from prostitutes! There are too many cops who
cannot be trusted to refrain from ‘reportilying’ or using their authority to rape/extort or even kill
them.30 Cops like Florida’s prolific serial killer Gerard Schaefer, who is estimated to have killed
between 34 and 170 women, many of them murdered during his tenure as a police officer and
deputy sheriff in Broward County. Schaefer would lure young women, with the help of his badge,
to rape, torture, mutilate and murder them. He enjoyed tying his victims to trees, leaving them
there while he went about his work as a police officer. According to author Stacy Dittrich in her
2010 book “Murder Behind the Badge,” Schaefer considered himself to be an angel of God, ‘A
self proclaimed messiah put on earth to rid the world of all whores, sinners and disobedient
In 1982, the year I left the LAPD in disgust, a cop scandal broke out that seemed at first to
only involve the so called Hollywood burglary ring in which the cops who were part of the
‘special burglary response unit’ would set off the alarms of various electronic equipment stores
and then go in and steal whatever equipment was on the list of desired merchandise submitted by
other cops. When caught, one of the partners, Jack Myers, admitted committing so many
burglaries that he couldn’t remember exactly how many, but at least 150.
The burglary ring was just one of the many nefarious activities of the cops in the
Hollywood Division. According to Officer Myers before he was killed in a tragic auto ‘accident,’
“the corruption was a hundred times worse than anyone thought.” He said, “the illegal activities
also involved policemen picking up prostitutes on the boulevard and taking them up to the ‘tree’
(in Griffith Park) for sexual activity that he said involved ‘half of the division.’ In return for
sexual favors, the police would not hassle the women during their solicitations. Once the ‘main
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 15
man’ had the police involved with the prostitutes, gambling and drinking on duty, he had them in
a position where they could not divulge other improprieties.”
A prostitute named Sandra Bowers31 was set to be a key witness against the officers, but
she was murdered prior to giving testimony. With two witnesses no longer around, none of the
other officers were convicted.
Also that year, as I learned from the late attorney Harry Weiss, considered to be the
granddaddy of all Los Angeles criminal lawyers, that three LA call girls who had filed a lawsuit
against the LAPD cops for having sex with them before they were arrested, had met with fatal car
accidents not unlike burglar officer Jack Myers. Harry did not think it was a coincidence.
In 1984, the year I was arrested for one count of pandering and for which I ultimately
served a nearly six year sentence,32 two San Francisco vice cops were given a pass after they
hired a prostitute to orally copulate a recruit during a Police Academy graduation party at the
Rathskeller Restaurant. A day after she testified against the cops, the prostitute was arrested,
standing on a street corner talking with two friends. The vice cops were not charged with
pandering,33 even though it clearly was a case of ‘encouraging a person to commit an act of
prostitution’- the same crime for which I had been arrested, prosecuted and incarcerated. In the
San Francisco case, the prostitute actually orally copulated the recruit, but in my case, the date
never took place.
In 1988, a Kern County (CA) Sheriff’s Deputy, David Rogers, was sentenced to die in the
gas chamber for the murder of two prostitutes. Rogers admitted shooting one of the women in an
argument over the amount due for a sex act.
Also in 1988, two LAPD officers, Richard Ford and Robert Von Villas, were convicted of
attempting to murder an exotic dancer to collect a $100,000 life insurance policy they took out on
And again in 1988, another LAPD sergeant, Emmanuel Valencia, was found to have
participated in lewd acts with a transvestite prostitute on numerous occasions. He received a 6
month suspension without pay. He did not lose his job. He did not go to jail.
In November 1988, ex- CHP Officer William Taylor was convicted of running a teenage
prostitution ring and sentenced to 8 years. He could have received 16 years.
In 1991, Officer Charles Jiles, from Upland California, was convicted of operating a
prostitution ring in Orange County.
In 1996, San Francisco police officer Francis Hogue, was sentenced to 6 years in prison for
kidnapping a masseuse and forcing her to orally copulate him while on duty.
In 1997, the New York Daily News reported “Ex-Cop guilty of paralyzing prostitute.” A
former cop was convicted of shooting and paralyzing a Queens prostitute who mocked him after
he failed to perform sexually.
In 1998, five years after the ‘clean up’ of police corruption that spawned the Mollen
Commission and subsequent report, a sex scandal of epic proportions erupted in the Midtown
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 16
South Precinct where numerous cops had been for years protecting a local brothel and having sex
with the prostitutes on a regular basis.
The “worst kept secret on the block” came to light when a factory owner caught one of the
prostitutes sneaking a client into a bathroom of his handbag factory. He threatened to call the
cops, but she retorted
“What would you say if I told you my boyfriend is... a cop, so when you call the police, you’ll be
calling him.” According to the Daily News, “Up and down the block, immigrant garment
workers, factory managers and short order cooks spoke matter-of-factly about the alleged deal
that kept the hookers in business and the cops happy... Police officers were a regular sight at one
of the more notorious hooker hangouts...”
On July 22, 1998, NY Post’s Murray Weiss wrote “As many as 40 cops will face criminal
or departmental charges in the police brothel scandal- twice the number of officers already
stripped of their guns and badges... Sources say cops implicated in the decade long sex- forprotection
racket face the stiffest charges...”
In 1999, the Associated Press reported that “Three current or former Hartford police
officers were arrested by federal agents... and another arrest was possible.” The officers were
charged with violating the civil rights of Hartford area prostitutes by forcing them to engage in
sex under the threat of arrest...
In 2004, during an undercover sting, former Chatham Township (NJ) Police Chief Thomas
Ramsey “was caught trying to set up a prostitution business with a female convict in Mount
Olive, promising her he could bring security and unique qualifications to the enterprise.”
Also in 2004 and also in New Jersey, Runnemede Police Chief James M. Leason was
charged with misconduct in office after authorities raided an apartment where a prostitution ring
was allegedly operating. Leason, 56, was charged with promoting prostitution.
On March 11, 2005, a Middlesex Township (PA) Police corporal accused of coercing
female suspects to have sex with him. Kenny Johnson, faced 20 charges, including rape,
involuntary sexual intercourse, sexual assault, bribery, tampering with evidence, oppression and
offenses related to prostitution.
On March 20, 201034 Camden, New Jersey, 29-year-old Officer Kevin Parry pleaded
guilty the in US District Court, admitting having stolen drugs and money along with other officers
after conducting illegal searches, arresting illegally and for having planted and traded drugs for
securing information from prostitutes and issued threats to arrest those unwilling to cooperate in
their illegal acts.
On April 9, 2010, from the Orange County Register- Two California officers Anthony
Orban, a five-year officer with the Westminster police, and Jeff Jelinek, a state prison guard at the
Chino Institute for Men, now face life in prison if convicted of the crime that unfolded in the
parking lot of the Ontario Mills Mall on April 3. The two had an all day drinking spree and then
decided to kidnap and rape a 25 year old waitress who just got off work. Perhaps they mistook her
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 17
for a hooker because as Ronald Huff,35 a criminologist at UC Irvine, said, “Crimes of random
violence by police officers are unusual. It's statistically bizarre to have an officer assault a
woman in broad daylight and rape her like this case alleges. This is really rare." Huff said that
“if you hear about a cop sexually assaulting a woman, it's usually involves a prostitute or a
traffic stop in a remote location.” And it ‘usually involves’ a prostitute because the cops usually
get away with it. Too bad for them, because if she had been a prostitute, no doubt they would get
probation sentences.
Even judges use their authority and influence to get sexual favors or to escape punishment
when they get caught with prostitutes, like Judge Benjamin Diaz.36 In 1984, Sacramento Superior
Court Judge Diaz was caught with a prostitute, Kassandra Daniels, whom he picked up “for
laughs.” The judge was cited and released on his promise to appear at his arraignment while the
prostitute was arrested and released after posting a $2,000 bond.
In 1988, the Los Angeles Times reported that Orange County Municipal Judge Brian Carter
was ordered to go to a formal hearing on allegations that he and Judge Calvin Schmidt had given
lenient treatment to prostitutes in return for sexual favors.
The US Government allows law enforcement agents to hire prostitutes to have sex with
other suspected criminals to gain information and a conviction. In March, 1987, the LA Times
reported that the US 9th Circuit Court of appeals ruled that it is "unrealistic to expect law
enforcement officers to ferret out criminals without the help of unsavory characters, a federal
appeals court reinstated criminal charges against a suspected heroin dealer caught with the help
of a prostitute acting as a government informant. Helen Miller, who according to evidence
presented in the case was known to the government as a prostitute and heroin user, was employed
by the FBI as an informant in an investigation of a suspected heroin dealer...”
Are we to believe that it is okay for the government to pay a prostitute to have sex with
someone, as long as the ‘someone’ is a worse criminal than the prostitute? Evidently the judges
were not aware that pandering is worse than rape or robbery because ‘prostitution is like rape,’
and thus the judges ruled that taxpayers can pay for a woman to be raped by a drug suspect. How
is it that the same government that wants to protect ‘prostituted’ women from exploitation,
considers those ‘exploited women’ to be ‘unsavory characters’?
The above examples of police and judicial corruption in connection with the enforcement
of prostitution laws are unfortunately but a few of the thousands I have collected through the
years, from early 1900 to the present. There is overwhelming evidence police officers are not only
hypocritical in the enforcement of prostitution laws, but have much to gain personally and
professionally to keep women under the control of such laws. I knew from the time that two of
my LAPD colleagues offered me $200 to be the going away present for a retiring captain there
something was very wrong with laws which could be so arbitrarily enforced.
Recently there has been a change in the dialogue about prostitution. While many antiprostitutionists
still posit the ‘exploitation of women and children’ argument, others have begun
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 18
using another, equally fatuous, argument to keep consenting adult prostitution illegal. They are
now suggesting that even if a woman consents to engage in sex work, she doesn’t really have
‘choices’37 and decriminalizing prostitution will not change that, so they oppose decriminalizing
consenting adult prostitution on that basis. As long as prostitution remains a crime, the only
‘choices’ prostitutes really have are whether or not to cooperate with the cops; give the cops sex
for protection, become an informant, or go to jail. Inasmuch as being arrested for prostitution
renders us nearly unemployable, making us criminals will ensure that we never have any other
Having established that law enforcement agents, being human, are prone to abuse their
powers when it comes to enforcing victimless crime laws- I can state unequivocally that it is
unconscionable to continue to give cops authority over adults who, for whatever reason, engage in
sex work. The actual harm done to those who are victims of arbitrary law enforcement is far more
serious than any supposed harm that may be inflicted on ‘victims’ by being paid for sexual
activities that would be legal if they were not paid, or the dubious harm of not having ‘choices’
such as finding other jobs that pays anywhere near $100 or $5,000 an hour. Those who end up
cleaning toilets for minimum wage don’t have any other job options or ‘choices,’ or they
wouldn’t be cleaning toilets for a living. No one would suggest that lack of choices for janitors is
a legitimate reason to criminalize their work and throw them in jail, would they?
How great is the harm to true victims of trafficking and sexual slavery, who cannot be
helped because there are no resources available to help them? The limited resources that are
available are squandered by law enforcement agencies arresting prostitutes and their clients
without proof of exploitation or abuse. But why would we arrest ‘victims’ in the first place?
Using the pretext of ferreting out underage prostitution, sex slavery and trafficking, the police and
FBI arrest everyone first and then sort out the ‘victims.’ If an adult prostitute is not a victim,
should they be arrested because they aren’t victims? And if a client or ‘john’ has not abused a sex
worker or hired an underage person, is it appropriate to charge them with a crime38? Or threaten
to label them as sex offenders?39 Wouldn’t it be better for underage persons if we started labeling
the pedophiliac priests and Boy Scout leaders as sex offenders before we do this to non-abusive
clients of prostitutes whose only ‘crime’ is being horny... or lonely?
The harm done to law enforcement, through the enticement of good officers into accepting
money or other favors from those ‘victims,’ is immeasurable. Police officers learn quickly that the
best way to score convictable arrests is by reportilying, and they know that the prosecutors, judges
and juries will always believe them over the whores. Society looks the other way because, after
all, the cops are ‘rescuing’ the women and children.
Finally, there is the harm that is done to society, which loses confidence in its law
enforcement agents and the criminal justice system, because trust has been lost and faith in the
system irreparably damaged. Victims of real crimes are left with the unpleasant realization that
the system cares more about pursuing and punishing ‘victims’ of a subjective theory- that
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 19
commercial sex harms and exploits all women regardless of their age or consent- than it cares
about their plight, providing no justice for those who did not consent to being robbed or raped.
Ask the rape victims in Los Angeles, San Diego and Chicago40 how they feel about the
rape kits41 that have gone untested for years because those police departments don’t have the
financial resources to process the kits and search for the rapists, but can afford to send 100
officers42 out to arrest 14 unarmed ‘suspected prostitutes.’
Those who press for stronger penalties and more restrictive legislation for commercial sex
fail to take
into account the historic corruptibility of vice law enforcers. When even those with money, power
and position- men who write the laws like former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer and
Louisiana Senator David Vitter- are willing to risk everything for a tryst with a prostitute- how
can we expect the average law enforcement agent to resist temptation when he knows the odds are
in his favor that he won’t get caught? How many cases does it take before society understands
that these abuses are not an aberration but the general rule? Police perpetrators find prostitutes
easy targets for the same reason serial killers do- because they believe no one is going to care if a
whore is raped or killed. And the only people who say they do care, want to put us in the custody
of the men who are more likely to harm us than protect us!
The cumulative and unacceptable damage to every segment of society from the arbitrary
enforcement of victimless crime laws should cause us to reconsider our priorities. With the
limited resources we have, we should concentrate on protecting citizens from those who would do
them real harm. Unfortunately, the greatest harm to society as a whole comes from those wishing
to protect us from ourselves, ‘for our own good.’
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 20
Works Cited
Abraham, Yvonne 1999 "Victim's Past Overshadows Murder." The Boston Globe 11/15/99.
Arax, Mark 1986 "Judge Says Law Doesn't Protect Prostitutes, Drops Rape Count." Los Angeles
Times 4/24/86: 1-2.
Associated Press 2005 "Tenn. Prosecutor Probes Police Tactics." 02/02/05Accessed through
Lexis-Nexis Academic Universe.
Brown, Tina 2005 "Judge: Suit Can Target City, Ex-Police Chief; Ruling Clarifies Civil Case."
Hartford Courant 2/11/05: B-6.
Butler, Margot Leigh 2001 "Making Waves." Women's Studies International Forum 24(3-4):
Cantlupe, Joe 1990 "Alleged Link Between Cops, Prostitutes Raise Many Deeply Troubling
Questions." San Diego Union 9/30/90: A-9.
Carlton, Jim and Gerry Hicks 1988 "Pair with Ties to Judge Had to Dismiss 20 Infractions"
11/20/88. Available online at:
Carter, Alan 1994 "Prostitution Laws Serve to Protect Weak from Exploitation" The New York
Times Letter to the Editor, 12/7/94. Available online at:
Dittrich, Stacy 2009 Murder Behind the Badge: True Stories of Cops Who Kill. New York:
Prometheus Books.
Doezema, Jo 2000 Loose Women or Lost Women? The Re-emergence of the Myth of White
Slavery in Contemporary Discourses of Trafficking In Women. Gender Issues 18(1): 38-54.
Dohohue, Pete 1997 "Ex-Cop Guilty of Paralyzing Prostitute." The New York Daily News, 5/14.
Available online at:
Dwyer, Jim 2008 "Honesty is the Sole Policy, Except When It's Not" The New York Times
8/2/08: B-1.
Efrati, Amir 2009 "Legal System Struggles with How to React When Police Officers Lie." The
Wall Street Journal A-12.
Farr, William 1982 "Prostitute, Key Witness in LAPD Scandal, Slain." LA Times 9/16/82. Jackman, Tom
2006 "Spotsylvania(VA) Deputies Receive Sex Services in Prostitution Cases."
The Washington Post 2/13/06.
KCRA 2005 "Houston Officers Can Now Get Naked for Prostitutes: Unwritten Policy Allows
Officers to Disrobe." Available online at
L.A. Times, The 1995 "Long Beach Officer Gets Probation in Sex Case" 1/18/95: B-11.
1984 "Judge Put on Probation, Fined for Sex Incident." 11/5/84
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 21
Klepper, David 2010 “Kansas Ponders Adding Prostitutes’ Customers to Sex Offender List. The
Kansas City Star 3/24/10. Available online at:
New York Sun, The. “Police Officer Is Charged With Sexually Abusing Stepdaughter.” 10/11/06
New York Times, The 1992 “Officer Convicted of Rape.” Available online at:
MacNamara, Joseph D. 1996 “Has the Drug War Created an Officer Liars’ Club?” The Times
Union, p. A-11. Albany, NY.
Marzulli, John 2010 “2 Cops Who Killed for Mafia: Feds Say Retired Detective Pals are Linked to at Least 8
Murders.” The NY Daily News 3/16/2010.
2010 “2 NYPD Police Officers Charged In $1M NJ Perfume Heist." The NY Daily News
2010 "2 Cops Who Killed for Mafia: Feds Say Retired Detective Pals are Linked to at Least 8
Murders." The NY Daily News 3/16/10.
2009 “ Judge Jack Weinstein Rips NYPD on False Arrests.” The NY Daily News 11/30/09
McPhee, Michele, Carolina Gonzalez and Dave Goldiner 1998 "Nabe: Police Hookups Well-
Known." 7/18/98. Available online at:
Modesto Bee 2010 “7 Arrested In Prostitution Bust.” The Modesto Bee 4/3/10.
Mulvihill, Geoff 2010 "Residents of NJ City Say Cops Worse Than Criminals." Associated
Press, available online at
Murphy, Kim 1987 "Court OKs Government Use of Sex to Seize Suspect." Los Angeles Times
4/9/87. Available online at:
Oliver, Ryan 2003 "Cops Hit Suspected Valley Prostitution Dens." LA Daily News 7/1/03.
Popp, Robert 1984 "No Indictments Due in S.F. Cops' Sex Party." The San Francisco Chronicle
Poppy Project, The 2008 Big Brothel: A Survey of the Off-Street Sex Industry in London.
London: The Poppy Project.
Quindlen, Anna 1994 "Public and Private: Sex For Sale." The New York Times Letter to the
Editor, 12/7/94. Available online at:
Rogers, Brian 2010 "HPD Vice Officer Accused of Record Tampering." The Houston Chronicle
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 22
3/1/10. Available online at:
Rohrlich, Ted 1984 "Deputy Charged with Rape at Courthouse." LA Times 3/14/84
Salazar, Denise and Greg Hardesty 2010 “Police Chief: ‘Morale Low’ After Officer Charged in
Rape.” The Orange County Register 4/09/10. Available online at:
Scolforo, Mark 2009 "Prostitution Case Tossed Over Government-Funded Sex." The Gettysburg Times
11/6/09 Available online at
Slobogin, Christopher 2009 “Testilying: Police Perjury and What to Do About It.” University of
Colorado Law Review Fall 67: 1037-1060.
Stossel, John 2010 "Should Black Market Industries Be Legal?" 3/3/10. Available online at:
Strickler, Laura 2009 "CBS Finds More Rape Kits Still Untested: San Diego Has Over 2,000
Kits." Available online at:
Supreme Court of California 2006 "The People v. David Kern Rogers." Available online at:
1988 "People v. Freeman." 46 Cal.3d 419, 758 P.2d 1128; 250 Cal.Rptr.598.
Timnick, Lois 1990 "Court Told of Help Madam Gave Police" The Los Angeles Times 5/19/90:
Torres, Vicki 1985 "Slain Woman Linked to Police Sex Case." San Diego Tribune 6/1/85.
United States Congress 2000 Victims of Trafficking and Violence Prevention Act of 2000. Public
Law 106-386. Available online at www.
Weiss, Murray 1998 "Brothel Cops Face 'Double' Trouble- 20 Cited- But 40 May Now Be In
Hot Water." 7/22/98. Available online at:
Wong, Dean 1993 "Victim's Parents Assail Douglas' Release." The Boston Globe 6/5/93.
1 7 Arrested In Prostitution Bust Modesto Bee Staff Reports 4/3/10
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 23
Seven women were arrested Thursday night on suspicion of intending to commit prostitution at
a South Ninth Street motel, authorities said. Given a relatively slow night, a few Stanislaus County
Sheriff's deputies decided to "put a dent" into the area's prostitution problem, according to Lt. Charles
Grom. Deputies converged at the California Inn, 1130 S. Ninth St.
There, they watched as various women flagged down cars. As soon as one of the women got a
customer, an officer would alert another deputy who would watch the two enter a motel room. Less
than two minutes later, they would knock on the door and arrest the woman, Grom said. Since the
arrest came before anything was consummated, Grom said, the women were charged with loitering
with the intent to commit prostitution, a misdemeanor. Grom said taking that approach, instead of
waiting for the act that would lead to prostitution charges, was less time-consuming and complicated.
"This was a spur of the moment thing by our deputies," he said. "We're making it known that this type
of activity is not welcome and if you're going to do something, do it somewhere else." The men were
not cited but were encouraged to "go home and not come back."
2 3/16/10 NY Daily News by John Marzulli “2 COPS WHO KILLED FOR MAFIA: FEDS SAY RETIRED
3 10/11/06 New York Sun “Police Officer Is Charged With Sexually Abusing Stepdaughter”
4 9/30/1990 San Diego Union
5 5/19/90 LA Times Lois Timnick “COURT TOLD OF HELP MADAM GAVE POLICE”
6 1979 Associated Press- Spokane, WA PROSTITUTION INVESTIGATORS MAY HAVE SEX ‘Police agents
may engage in sex to carry out prostitution investigations as long as they don’t try to trap anyone into
the crime, a Spokane County District Court Judge has ruled. Judge Daniel Maggs said “It may violate
public morals but personal beliefs can’t be substituted for the law.”’
Harris County prosecutor says Houston police are now allowed to undress as part of prostitution
investigations. Some hookers demand johns take off all their clothes before negotiating a price. They
mistakenly believe a real cop won't get naked. Prosecutor Ted Wilson says some plainclothes officers
were without their clothes during a four-month sting operation. The investigation ended in November
with 56 arrests.”
7 11/6/09 Gettysburg Times PA. BY Mark Scolforo (AP) – “PROSTITUTION CASE TOSSED OVER GOV'TFUNDED
SEX” HARRISBURG, Pa. — An appeals court has ruled Pennsylvania State Police botched a
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 24
prostitution investigation in which troopers gave an informant money to pay for sex four times at a
massage parlor, along with a total of $180 for the man's trouble.
8 Legally defined as money or other consideration, which includes dinner, drinks or even mowing
someone’s lawn.
9 Freeman V. California 1984- the judge ruled that it may be prostitution but the first amendment
protected the same activity when it was being filmed for the sexual gratification of a third party who
was not present during filming.
10 California Penal Code 653.24. (a) it is unlawful for any person to loiter in, on, or near any public
place with the intent to commit prostitution. (b) "Public place" means an area open to the public, or an
alley, plaza, park, driveway, or parking lot, or an automobile, whether moving or not...
11 3/19/10 ABUSE CLAIMS IN POPE'S EX-DIOCESE ‘Pope Benedict XVI's former diocese in Germany is
facing daily allegations of physical and sexual abuse, the head of its new sex-abuse task force says.’
3/15/10 The National Post- by Araminta Wordsworth “But what staggers me is once again the
immediate, visceral circling of the wagons — when what is being revealed — again! — is a pattern of
criminal abuse, aided and abetted by a powerful elite, led by the Pope himself. If this were a secular
institution, the police would move in and shut it down.”
SEX ABUSE OF YOUNG BOYS” PORTLAND, Ore. ‘Six boxes of evidence could blow the lid off decades of
hidden sexual abuse in the Boy Scouts of America...’
CONGENITAL LIARS?” "WHY COPS LIE ABOUT DRUG EVIDENCE" “Not many people took defense attorney
Alan M. Dershowitz seriously when he charged that Los Angeles cops are taught to lie at the birth of
their careers at the Police Academy. But as someone who spent 35 years wearing a police uniform, I've
come to believe that hundreds of thousands of law-enforcement officers commit felony perjury every
year testifying about drug arrests. These are not cops who take bribes or commit other crimes. Other
than routinely lying, they are law-abiding and dedicated. They don't feel lying under oath is wrong
because politicians tell them they are engaged in a ``holy war'' fighting evil.” And when it comes to
prostitution, the cops feel that they are “protecting women and children from exploitation and
trafficking. So of course it is okay to falsify an arrest report... right? [Joseph MacNamara was a police
officer and also the Chief of Police in San Jose, CA]
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 25
14 11/30/09 NY Daily News by John Marzulli “JUDGE JACK WEINSTEIN RIPS NYPD ON FALSE ARRESTS..
1/29/09 Wall Street Journal by Amir Efrati ‘LEGAL SYSTEM STRUGGLES WITH HOW TO REACT WHEN
POLICE OFFICERS LIE’ "It is an open secret long shared by prosecutors, defense lawyers and judges
that perjury is widespread among law enforcement officers, though it's difficult to detect in specific
cases,” said Alex Kozinski, a federal appeals-court judge, in the 1990s.
12/1/1998 Testimony of Alan M. Dershowitz before the House of Representatives Judiciary
Committee. And even more cops perjure themselves on prostitution arrest reports. Most prostitutes do
not go to trial as the prosecutors threaten to give the prostitute a much longer sentence if he/she dares to
request a trial. If the prostitute has children, they threaten to have Social Services take them away. So
prostitutes are usually offered a probation sentence, not realizing that once they are on probation, the
cops can bust them for ‘possessing the intent to commit prostitution’ and send them straight to jail
without a trial. And given the amount of reportilying done by police everywhere, it doesn’t really take
an actual violation of law on the part of the prostitute to end up in jail.
157/31/09 Boston Globe By Dick Lehr “A NEW ‘BRIGHT LINE RULE’ AGAINST LYING”
16 Fall 1996 University of Colorado Law Review by Christopher Slobogin ‘REFORM THE POLICETESTILYING:
17 Alston (n 26)
18 3/1/10 Houston Chronicle by Brian Rogers ‘HPD VICE OFFICER ACCUSED OF RECORD TAMPERING’
Veteran Hollywood Police Officer Dewey Pressley said he hated lying. But if bending the truth a little
would keep a fellow officer out of trouble, well, he was all for it. A dashboard police camera video that
surfaced recently showed Pressley chuckling as he wrote a fake police report, calling his creativity "a
little Walt Disney" so another officer wouldn't get in trouble for rear-ending a 23-year-old woman's
car in February.
12/1/1998 Testimony of Alan M. Dershowitz before the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee
“I represented, on appeal, a lawyer accused of corruption. The major witness against him was a
policeman who acknowledged at trial that he himself had committed three crimes while serving as a
police officer. He denied that he had committed more than these three crimes. It was subsequently
learned that he had, in fact, committed hundreds of additional crimes, including some he specifically
denied under oath. He too was never prosecuted for perjury, because a young Assistant U.S. Attorney,
named Rudolph Giuliani, led a campaign against prosecuting this admitted perjurer. Shortly
afterward, the policeman explained: ‘Cops are almost taught how to commit perjury when they are in
the Police Academy. Perjury to a policeman- and to a lawyer, by the way - is not a big deal. Whether
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 26
they are giving out speeding tickets or parking tickets, they're almost always lying...’ [And you can be
certain when they are arresting prostitutes, they are lying too!] Nor is the evidence of police perjury
merely anecdotal. Numerous commission reports have found rampant abuses in police departments
throughout the country. All objective reports point to a pervasive problem of police lying, and
tolerance of the lying by prosecutors and judges...”
4/22/94 New York Times by Joe Sexton “New York City police officers often make false arrests,
tamper with evidence and commit perjury on the witness stand, according to a draft report of the
mayoral commission investigating police corruption. The practice — by officers either legitimately
interested in clearing the streets of criminals or simply eager to inflate statistics — has at times been
condoned by superiors, the report says. And it is prevalent enough in the department that it has its own
nickname: ‘testilying.’ ‘Perjury is perhaps the most widespread form of police wrongdoing facing
today's criminal justice system,’ the draft report says.”
1999 St. John's University School of Law by Larry Cunningham: ‘TAKING ON TESTILYING: THE
1999 “When an officer is deceptive in court, he is ‘not quite lying’ but ‘not quite testifying truthfully
either. ‘Testilying’ is seen as a middle ground between pure honesty and pure dishonesty... This alleged
‘ethical middle ground’ is perhaps the best evidence of the ethical problems with testilying. Officers
invented a word in part to avoid acknowledging that testilying sometimes involved committing perjury
and other illegal acts. The fact that they do not call their actions perjury or deception or some other
term with clearly unethical implications evinces their belief that testilying- whatever form, illegal or
legal- is somehow justified.” The same goes for reportilying, which as I mention elsewhere, is all that a
vice cop usually has to do to force a suspected prostitute to accept a plea deal from the prosecution.
20 Fox News, Philadelphia PA Sharon Crowley reporter (as quoted in a March 2010 John Stossel report
on Fox Business News)
21 Perhaps those who support such a solution for saving the lives of prostitutes would also support the
idea of cops arresting victims of domestic violence and keeping them in jail, so those women might not
end up dead either, like Scott Peterson’s pregnant wife Laci in 2002, or like Bolingbrook Illinois Police
Officer Drew Peterson’s ex wife Kathleen Savio and wife Stacy, whose body has yet to be found. If
only the cops could have put those wives in jail to protect them from their abusive spouses, they might
still be alive today! But when the husband who kills his wife is a cop, who is left to protect them for
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 27
3/21/10 WNEP Moosic, Pa By Renie Workman “DEADLY SHOOTING IN SUNBURY” A Sunbury police
officer has died after a shooting early Saturday morning in Northumberland County that also killed his
wife. Investigators believe the shooting was a result of a domestic dispute between the two... State
police said 38-year-old Robin Miller died Saturday in their home on Catawissa Avenue and 37-yearold
Michael Miller was taken to Geisinger Medical Center with critical inuries. Officials at the
hospital said he passed away early Sunday morning, a little more than 24-hours after the shootings.
22 6/4/1993 Boston Herald by Eric Fehrnstrom and Joe Heaney “DOUGLAS RELEASE SPARKS OUTRAGE”
COUNT” “Pasadena Superior Court Judge Gilbert C. Alston granted his own motion last week for a
find of not guilty in the case against Daniel Zabuski, 25, of Alhambra, a former South Gate police
jailer. In granting the motion, court transcripts show, Alston made a general statement that a working
prostitute could not be the victim of rape, even is she was forced to engage in sexual intercourse.”
24 3/14/1984 LA Times by Ted Rohrlich “DEPUTY CHARGED WITH RAPE AT COURTHOUSE”
25 Prostitution is: a) sexual harassment b) rape
c) battering d) verbal abuse e) domestic violence f) a racist practice g) a violation of human
rights h) childhood sexual abuse i) a consequence of male domination of women j) a means of
maintaining male domination of women k) all of the above
26 2/1/91 NY Newsday
2/11/05 Courant Staff Writer (Hartford Connecticut) by Tina Brown “A federal judge ruled that a jury
should decide if the city of Hartford and former Police Chief Joseph Croughwell can be held liable in a
civil suit that claims a lack of supervision in the late 1990s created and condoned an environment that
allowed cops to sexually assault prostitutes without fear of discipline, court papers say.
But U.S. District Judge Alan H. Nevas said in federal court papers that several former supervisors in
the department could not be held personally liable in the suit, filed by a former drug-addicted
prostitute, because they were not the direct supervisors of the two officers Salvatore Abateillo and
Jesus Rivera -who were convicted of sexual misconduct in the criminal case. Nevas also ruled that
Abateillo and Rivera will join Croughwell as defendants in the civil trial.
In a strongly worded decision, Nevas said, ‘Chief Croughwell had ultimate supervisory authority over
every officer under his command. Nevertheless, during his watch, at least five department officers were
prosecuted and convicted of sexually assaulting city prostitutes.’”
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 28
27 1/18/95 LA Times “LONG BEACH OFFICER GETS PROBATION IN SEX CASE” (original news article in
the LA Times in May, 1994, “OFFICER TO STAND TRIAL IN RAPE OF PROSTITUTE”) “A Long Beach
police officer who admitted to forcing a prostitute to have sex with him in his patrol car was sentenced
Tuesday to five years probation... Prosecutors had asked the judge to sentence Ellsberry to the
maximum term of four years in prison...” It is NOT mandatory to send a convicted rapist to prison,
even though it is a cop who did the raping, while it is mandatory to send a convicted panderer to prison
for three to nine years even if none of the prostitutes were ever raped or were ever in jeopardy of being
raped (except by vice cops who might force the victims to give them a blow job or go to jail...). This is
an interesting way to protect prostitutes from ‘exploitation’ and potential harm!
THEM by Carolyn O'Hara reviewing the Freakonomics book “It is estimated that roughly 3 percent of
all tricks performed by prostitutes who aren't working with pimps are freebies given to police to avoid
arrest. In fact, prostitutes get officially arrested only once per 450 tricks or so, leading the authors to
conclude that "a prostitute is more likely to have sex with a police officer than to get officially arrested
by one." When freebies given to gang members are factored in, about one in 20 tricks go solely for
protection and the "privilege" of plying their trade.....” from ‘An Empirical Analysis of Street-Level
Prostitution’ by Steven D. Levitt and Sudhir Alladi Venkatesh September 2007
30 6/85 San Diego Tribune by Vicki Torres “SLAIN WOMAN LINKED TO POLICE SEX CASE” “A woman
found 11 days ago beaten and strangled near Sunrise Highway in Pine Valley has been identified as
Donna Marie Gentile, a convicted prostitute whose involvement with two San Diego police officers
resulted in the demotion of one and the firing of another...” Gentile was the second victim in the string
of prostitute murders, which ultimately numbered over 45. A street sex worker and police informant,
Gentile was found strangled to death, her mouth stuffed with gravel, a month after she testified against
two police officers.
Donna’s death and the murder of 45 other prostitutes from 1985 to 1992 became a rallying point for a
number of San Diego artists, who were horrified to learn that the police consider homicides of
prostitutes to be ‘NHIs’ - an unofficial police term meaning ‘No Humans Involved.’ To have those who are supposed to protect
prostitutes categorize prostitute murders as NHIs does not render as credible LA Prosecutor Alan
Carter’s concern for Heidi’s girls! Unfortunately the use of the term ‘NHI’ is not limited to San Diego
cops. It is used by cops nationwide to denote the homicides of ‘disposable people.’
prostitute who was to be a key witness in the investigation of the burglary and sex scandals plaguing
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 29
the Los Angeles Police Department’s Hollywood Division has been murdered, The Times learned
Wednesday. Sandra Bowers, 26, was found Sunday night ...with her throat slashed and a dozen stab
wounds in her back. She is the second witness in the ongoing investigation to die violently. Jack Myers,
the first policeman to be caught in the burglary scandal and the first to incriminate fellow officers, was
killed May 12 when he somehow lost control of his pickup truck and was hurled out of the vehicle,
landing on his head in the middle of the Simi Valley Freeway...”
32 That’s counting the 50 days in solitary confinement to be studied to see if I was dangerous to
society, the 2 years and 7 months on probation with no violations, the 18 months in prison and another
18 months on parole.
33 8/2/84 San Francisco Chronicle by Robert Popp “NO INDICTMENTS DUE IN S.F. COPS’ SEX PARTY”
But in 1985, the Los Angeles District Attorney appealed my probation sentence because “in terms of
impact on the victim, whereas a robbery may have a traumatic effect on the victim lasting weeks or
months pandering can lead its victim to a lifetime of shame and degradation, robbing her of her bodily
integrity, personal privacy, self respect and reputation. Whereas rape is accomplished by one act of
force, pandering can cause a woman to be pressured into an endless series of acts of indiscriminate
sexual intercourse which progressively rape her spirit, character and self image... it is clearly a vicious
practice.” Unless the cops or the FBI are doing the pandering? And if the prostitutes are indeed the
victims, what are we to make of the 1995 Florida legislation that allows the prosecutors to fight
prostitution by charging ‘suspected prostitutes’ with racketeering and then face up to 30 years in
prison? Their clients are not charged, and in fact, can get out of testifying in court against the women
they hired by giving sworn statements to the cops. Palm Beach County authorities say that the 20
unidentified ‘johns’ who were not charged with a crime, ‘may stay anonymous’ as long as they
volunteer as good citizens to assist police and prosecutors in convicting the ‘suspected prostitutes.’
34 3/20/10
35 4/09/10 Orange County Register by Denisse Salazar and Greg Hardesty “Police Chief: ‘morale low’
after officer charged in rape”
37 The Poppy Project's (2008) report on indoor prostitution in London states: “On a fundamental level,
prostitution is an absolute expression of men’s power against women’s subordination and lack of
choices. Paying for prostitution services enables men to assert power and control over women in a way
which would be deemed unacceptable in any other sphere” (p. 8)
The Consequences of Arbitrary Enforcement of Prostitution Laws 30
38 As widespread as domestic violence and spousal abuse are, should we criminalize marriage to protect
women from husbands who may abuse them? Should we arrest husbands who haven’t abused their
wives, just in case they might someday?
39 3/24/10 The Star By DAVID KLEPPER “Kansas ponders adding prostitutes' customers to sex
offender list A bill passed by the Kansas House on Wednesday would land people convicted of hiring a
prostitute on the state’s sex offender list for 10 years. Many states, including Kansas, already require
sex offender registration for those soliciting minors. Some states, such as California, give judges the
discretion to require registration in solicitation cases. But adding solicitation to the crimes requiring
offender registration would be a significant expansion of the offender registry, critics said.”
department in suburban Chicago has been shocked to find a roomful of evidence left behind by a
village police department that shut down two years ago -- including a moldy sexual assault kit that
authorities said linked a man to the 2006 rape of a 13-year-old girl, nearly 200 guns and hundreds of
bags of narcotics... In all, seven rape kits had been left rotting in an unplugged refrigerator in the
former Ford Heights Police Department, Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart said. "You're not talking about
ineptness, neglect, you're talking about outrageous conduct of a police department that didn't care
about the residents out there," Dart said.’
41 CBS News online As of December 2009, Los Angeles had a backlog of 12,000 untested rape kits in
storage. San Diego Has Over 2,000 Untested Kits “We can only do so much with the resources we
have.” -Greg Matheson, Los Angeles Police Department Criminalistics Lab director, City of Los
Angeles crime laboratory
42In 2003, a prostitution sting called “Operation Silver Bullet” was conducted, which was, according to
the LA Daily News “one of LAPD’s largest prostitution stings in several years. Vice Detectives fanned
out across the San Fernando Valley and simultaneously raided seven suspected prostitution dens
fronting as legitimate businesses.” And the LAPD proudly reported that “approximately 100 officers
took part in Operation Silver Bullet, netting 14 arrests... which were all for solicitation, operating a
house of prostitution and residing in a house of prostitution...” Anyone who can do the math can figure
out that if it took 100 officers to bust 14 ‘suspected victims,’ that’s 7 cops per hooker/victim. The cops
were later given an awards banquet to honor them for their heroic work in making these dangerous

 Guest columnist, veteran prostitution rights activist Norma Jean Almodovar, author of Cop To Call Girl, founder and president of the International Sex Worker Foundation for Art, Culture and Education and executive director of the Los Angeles chapter of COYOTE .    Now without further ado, I turn this space over to Norma Jean.

Just as they did a year ago with Craigslist, a bunch of politically grandstanding States Attorneys General- cheered on by an overbearing, vociferous gaggle of anti- prostitution zealots and their sycophants from the far left and the far right-  got together andwrote a letter to the ownersof, demanding that the adult ads on their classified website be shut down “to stop sex trafficking.”  Despite the fact that they don’t have a constitutional leg to stand on, these blowhards decided they must force the closure of the adult ads section in this and any other online adult ad classified advertising site.

Although there are numerous other sites which cater solely to the adult crowd seeking other adults for adult activity, such as RentBoy- where virulently anti- gay Christian Psychologist Reverend George Rekers found his young stud travel companion on a trip to Italy- and countless other similar sites, it does not appear that these Attorneys General have much interest in pursuing those sites because many are for gay commercial sex and it is not politically correct to prosecute gays for the same ‘crimes’ they prosecute heterosexual adults.  Governments and religious institutions throughout history have attempted to eradicate what many call a scourge (but many others like me feel it is the best job we ever had), but none have been successful even when the punishment faced by those who violate the law is death.  So what motivates these particular politicians to attempt to “eliminate” all prostitution at whatever cost?

There are a number of studies which support the premise that the more vocal one is in denouncing another’s ‘immoral’ activities and demanding that they cease, the more likely it is that such a loudmouth is engaged in the very activity that he/she condemns.  It is a cliché that sanctimonious politicians pontificate on the importance of family values while having extra-marital affairs, buying the services of a prostitute (underage and adult) or sending text messages to persons who are not their spouses; the vehemently anti-gay politicians and preachers who secretly engage in homosexual relationships.  When it is a female politician, look for her husband to be a client of prostitutes, like U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow (D. Michigan).

Considering the enormous pressure being exerted on Backpage -and Craigslist a year ago- if one were cynical, one might think that those who are the most vocal in their demands to shut down adult ads because of the possibility that those ads are for prostitution- are being blackmailed or extorted by those abolitionists.  Consider that Eliot Spitzer, who, as New York’s State Attorney General, passionately denounced the evils of prostitution as he vigorously enforced laws against prostitution by day and paid for his ‘sex slaves’ by night… in some cases going out of state and violating the Mann Act, a federal crime called ‘sex trafficking’.  Spitzer rose to governorship on the back of political reform and cleaning up corruption.  According to many sources, his was a ‘scorched earth’ policy when it came to prosecuting white collar crimes.  One target of his wrath were ‘prostitution rings’  against which he had publicly vented with “revulsion and anger announcing the arrest of 16 people for operating a select prostitution ring” in 2004.  He dispatched his brand of justice in short order and sent them to prison.  In hindsight one could speculate that his show of revulsion and anger came not from a sense of moral repugnance at the thought of paid sex professionals but that the ‘select prostitution ring’ he targeted had perhaps been too selective and refused his business in the past? Or did he feel a sense of pride at being able to prosecute the competition of those who did provide him with their sexual services?

Or perhaps the abolitionists knew of Spitzer’s indiscretions and used that information to extort him to be aggressive in prosecuting others who engaged in buying or selling sex?  There is no doubt in my mind that if he had not been caught with his pants down, he would be joining the other politicians in their strident crusade to shut down adult ads.  So it is not unreasonable to suggest that perhaps some or many of the signers of this letter are in a similar position.  History – both distant and recent- suggests that this may be the case…

In July 2011, a high ranking Albuquerque Criminal Judge, Pat Murdoch, was arrested for raping a prostitute.  It was not the first time he had hired a sex worker, because the prostitute he hired admitted to previous engagements with the judge.  And surely the police were aware of his activities with prostitutes, which may explain why, in 2009, he was so lenient toward an Albuquerque Police Officer -David Maes– who was also charged with raping a prostitute.  Thoughtfully, after Maes plead ‘no contest’ to the charges, District Court Judge Pat Murdoch said “sending him to prison would be a harsh sentence for an ex-cop” and gave him 5 years probation.  After Judge Murdoch was charged with raping a prostitute, he resigned, and most likely none of his colleague judges will impose a prison sentence on him, knowing that when and if they ever get caught doing the same thing, they will want leniency from the judges who oversee their cases.

Judges like Federal Judge Jack Camp… or Judge Michael Hecht... or Edward Nottingham, the chief federal judge in Denver, Colorado.  Despite the fact that an ordinary citizen charged with violating the same laws that Reagan appointee Judge Jack Camp did would have been sentenced to multiple years- perhaps decades- in prison, Judge Camp was allowed to retire at full pension, sentenced to 30 days in prison and 400 hours of community service.  He served 15 days.

Back to the States Attorneys General- are they pursuing this because they are being extorted by the prohibitionists or because they really believe that shutting down adult ads is going to somehow stop human trafficking?  Surely they are not that naïve, are they?  Having been lawyers before they became prosecutors, they know exactly how things work and that prostitution was around long before the internet and will be around long after the internet shuts the sex workers out (or moves them to other websites).

They feign concern for the sexual exploitation of underage persons through the use of adult ads, commenting that “More than 50 cases of trafficking or attempted trafficking of minors on have been filed in 22 states in the past three years…”  But none of them mention that in 2011 alone, more than 100 cases of pedophile and child porn possessing police/ district attorneys/ judges were brought to court... NONE of those cases involved Backpage or Craigslist or any other classified website offering adult ads – just a bunch of perverted cops, judges, FBI agents etc. who had access to these young people because they are persons in authority whom no one suspects of diddling their children.  These numbers do not include the teachers, preacherspriests, boy scout leadersHollywood producers and other persons who are trusted by the community and who do not find their victims on Backpage.  The US Government reports that 90% of the cases of child sexual exploitation are at the hands of someone the child knows, like the above cops, teachers, etc. and 68% of the cases of child sexual abuse are at the hands of a family member.  So if, as the prohibitionists and their misinformed spokespeople suggest, there are between ‘100,000 to 300,000’ children trafficked into the sex trade every year, and if that represents only ten percent of the victims of child sexual exploitation from strangers, then the number of those sexually exploited by an acquaintance or family member must be in the millions per year.  As I mentioned earlier, however, the US Government’s own report says that these hundreds of thousands of human trafficking (which includes adults and those trafficked into many other areas of labor) can’t be found, with all the millions of dollars that they spend and all the government funded agencies looking for them.

Tragically, as many cases as there are of the victims mentioned above, there is an even greater number of underage persons who are subjected to rape and sexual exploitation by persons in authority, and the government is quite aware of it and yet does little to prevent it.  In fact, those juveniles are deliberately put in harms’ way at the insistence of the rabid prohibitions who claim they are ‘saving their lives.’  No doubt when the media reports that the FBI or other government agencies have ‘rescued’ dozens of ‘victims of child sexual trafficking’ during a sting operation (and arrest hundreds of adult prostitutes in the process), the general public envisions a militaristic style raid much like our armed forces conduct when they storm into an occupied country and free the enslaved citizens, who then jubilantly rally around our heroic soldiers with cries of gratitude.  Unfortunately nothing could be further from the truth for the underage victims of sex trafficking.  What the media and the government do not tell you is that ‘rescued’ means ‘arrested.’

When the cops and the feds – and for that matter, government agents anywhere in the world- conduct a ‘rescue’ raid, all persons of any age who are suspected of being prostitutes or of being ‘victims of sex trafficking’ are rounded up and herded into custody.  Handcuffed.  Chained to each other.  Put into jail cells.  Strip-searched.  Treated like vicious criminals.  And that is as it should be, according to some wonderfulChristian ladies of the Georgia Eagle Forum, or as I like to call their national group- the “Spread Eagle Forum.”  Women like Sue Ella Deadwyler, publisher of Georgia Insight, who stated – in opposition to the Republican Georgia state senator Renee Unterman who introduced a bill that would steer girls under the age of 16 into diversionary programs instead of arresting them as prostitutes – “Arrest is a valuable life-saving tool that must be usedWe need to hire more cops to arrest the prostitutes.”  She said that she believes that arrestis a better deterrent than a proposal for rehabilitation — no matter the age.  “Sure there are those who are forced into prostitution, but I think most of them volunteer,” Deadwyler said of under 16-year-old prostitutes.  “Many, many children have been scared straight because of arrest.”  Of course.

One of her colleagues argues, “We cannot repeal the prostitution law for children, because that law acts as a very real barrier that protects children from sexual predators that would, otherwise, feel free to lure them into prostitution….Have we forgotten that correction oftentimes turns a life around?”

They aren’t the only ones who believe that arresting victims is actually good for them.  Newser Staff writer Evann Gastaldo, wrote in her  March 4th, 2011 article: “Why We Must Arrest Child Prostitutes:  IT MAY SOUND CRUEL, BUT IT COULD BE THE ONLY THING THAT SAVES THEM.  Says she “Decriminalizing child prostitution (and not arresting them) means effectively ‘removing the only safe and secure protection these vulnerable children have from the pimps—being arrested and placed under the protective custody of law enforcement.’” And after one major ‘rescue’ of such victims, the Director of the FBI, Robert Mueller, stated“We may not be able to return their innocence but we can remove them from this cycle of abuse and violence.”

Umm, I wonder if either he or those nice Christian ladies or the States Attorneys General who are demanding the shutdown of adult ads on have read the US Government Justice Department’s own report on what happens to those children (and adult prostitutes) who are ‘placed under the protective custody of law enforcement…’- the report entitled “Sexual Victimization in Juvenile Facilities Reported by Youth, 2008-09”?

As the May 5th, 2011 issue of the Economist states“Sexual abuse in prison is distressingly common: the Justice Department estimated that more than 217,000 prisoners, including at least 17,000 juveniles, were raped or sexually abused in America in 2008.  A total of 12% of juvenile detainees… surveyed between 2008 and 2009 reported being forced into sex.  And that is the number of people, not incidents; most victims are abused more than once.  More inmates reported being abused by staff than by other inmates.”  So we arrest the victims and put them in jail where they are raped by those who are supposedly protecting them from sexual predators... like themselves.  And this of course will ‘turn their lives around’… actually it probably will; if this doesn’t mess up their heads and screw up their lives forever.  After the well-meaning Christian ladies and legislators tell them that it is for their own good to experience the trauma of being arrested and going to jail where they are raped by government agents in whose custody they are supposed to be safe, well, they would have to have an extremely strong character to survive the ‘rescue’ envisioned by these moral zealots.